On Friday 15 May 2009 03:45:21 Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> How about this? I took into account Ralf's comments as well.
We're talking a generic "one-size-fits-all" INSTALL here, right?
You *cannot* unequivocally assert this...
> If you wish to install the package into a staging directory
> (e.g. for packaging or testing purposes) then you can set the
> DESTDIR variable, @samp{make destd...@var{dir} install}.
On the one hand, DESTDIR is not even *required*, (by GCS), to be
supported by any given project; it is a "strongly recommended"
option, but it is by no means a mandatory requirement. This does
*not* fit, for any project which *chooses* not to implement DESTDIR
support. s/can/may/ and you come closer to reality, but it still
needs qualification, to indicate that DESTDIR isn't a universally
supported feature.
The other hand, we have already addressed; there are situations in
which, even if DESTDIR support *is* provided, it is so conceptually
broken as to be utterly useless. A prime example of this is the
case of native building of projects on MS-Windows, (which, like it
or not, remains the most popular and widely deployed desktop OS on
the planet), and where prefacing an arbitrary DESTDIR to a properly
defined $prefix, (which begins with a drive designator), results in
an invalid path name, causing the `make install' to blow up in the
user's face.
--
Regards,
Keith.
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
