On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd do it like below, completely untested.  Maybe I'd even move the last
> AC_CACHE_CHECK after the last 'fi', so that it is always run, and add
>  test "$cl_use_clisp" != "no" && test "X$cl_cv_clisp" != "X" && ...

sounds reasonable.
however, this way I will be testing variables which have never been set.
is this OK?
(I understand that unless I set -u, shell will not barf, but I was
wondering if that was considered bad style in aitoconf).

-- 
Sam Steingold <http://sds.podval.org>


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Reply via email to