On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Philip Herron <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8 December 2010 04:41, Mike Gibson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Does a test already exist that checks for if the >> operator in C does
>> arithmetic shift? Section 5.5.1 "Portability of C Functions" of the
>> manual mentions the problem, but lists nothing about a way of
>> determining actual behavior. Seems that it would simple enough that I
>> thought I would ask before I dive in and write something myself.
>
> You can write your own tests within your configure.ac, but to be fair
> operators like that for me i would _expect_ them to be there in any c
> compiler since its such a basic and important operation.
The problem isn't the existence of the operator. The problem is that
if you want to do an arithmetic shift, then you can't trust that >>
with signed values will always do the trick. The following test in
configure.ac does this:
dnl **** Check for arithmetic right shifting ****
AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether the right shift operator is an arithmetic right shift],
wine_cv_arithmetic_right_shift,
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM(
[[#if ((-4 >> 1) != -2)
#error "No simple arithmetic right shift"
#endif]], [[]])],
[wine_cv_arithmetic_right_shift=yes],
[wine_cv_arithmetic_right_shift=no]))
if test "$wine_cv_arithmetic_right_shift" = "yes"
then
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SIMPLE_ARITHMETIC_RIGHT_SHIFT,1,[Define if the right
shift operator is an arithmetic shift])
fi
Mike Gibson
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
