Den 2011-02-07 09:14 skrev Ralf Corsepius:
> Provided how HW has developed since the discussions from 10 years
> ago, you cited about, I am actually leaning towards proposing the
> converse of your proposal: Autoconf toconsider to abandoning
> config.cache.

No, it still needs to be optional.  Not everybody have the luxury
of running on the bare OS.  E.g. Cygwin is not very fast at
running configure and that matters a lot for me since I have a
number of packages with checks for about the same things and they
benefit *very* much from sharing the cache.

Cheers,
Peter

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Reply via email to