> >> * Direct mounts. These appear to require a significant slowdown to the
> >> entire VFS, and I do not believe this is justifiable.
> > I disagree here... this is an compatability issue. Whether it makes
>
> I've been wondering about the feasability of understanding direct mounts
> in the maps, while implementing them via symlinks to an add-hoc autofs mount
> point. It seems very doable right now with autofs v3 plus a few hacks
> (implemented via lookup_program.so). Would that be sufficient ?
That's trivial to do, obviously.
-hpa
- autofs v4: speak now or forever hold your peace H. Peter Anvin
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or forever hold your pe... Dmitry Pogosyan
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or forever hold your pe... Michael Newlyn Blake
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or forever hold you... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or forever hold you... Stefan Monnier
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or forever hold... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or forever ... Brian Vicente
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or for... Frithjof Anders
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or... Stefan Monnier
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or... Eric Werme USG
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or... Peter Funk
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or for... Alvin Oga
- Re: autofs v4: speak now or... Lori
- Re: autofs v4: speak no... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: autofs v4: speak no... Michael Newlyn Blake
- Re: autofs v4: speak no... H. Peter Anvin
