Do you have autofs compiled into the kernel or is it a module?  If it's a
module, you may want to try compiling it in.  It sounds like a race
between the module loader and automount.

---
Doug Harple / Community Connect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.asianavenue.com/ - http://www.blackplanet.com/

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, John Murtari wrote:

> Folks,
> 
>       We are running the standard 2.2.12 SMP kernel/no patches
> and are getting "occasionally" some boot problems from 
> autofs.
> 
>       We mount several files systems in our auto.master
> ====
> /misc         /etc/auto.misc  --timeout 28800
> /usr/local    /etc/auto.local -n,rsize=8192,wsize=8192
> /pub/comwww   /etc/auto.comwww -n,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 --timeout 600
> /pub/cgi-bin  /etc/auto.cgi   -n,rsize=8192,wsize=8192
> /export/lathe   /etc/auto.lathe       -n,rsize=8192,wsize=8192
> /home         /etc/auto.home  -n,rsize=8192,wsize=8192
> /export/anvil /etc/auto.anvil -n,rsize=8192,wsize=8192
> /export/torch /etc/auto.torch -n,rsize=8192,wsize=8192
> ===
> 
> on startup sometimes one or two of the automounter starts will
> "sometimes" fail.  Today we saw the following:
> 
> =====
> Sep 14 12:31:25 lathe autofs: Starting automounter:
> Sep 14 12:31:25 lathe automount[1025]: >> mount: fs type autofs not supported by 
>kernel
> Sep 14 12:31:25 lathe automount[1025]: /pub/comwww: mount failed!
> Sep 14 12:31:25 lathe rc: Starting autofs succeeded
> =====
> 
>       The mount of /pub/comwww/ failed.  We then just put
> in the automount command on the command line and it started fine.
> Is there some type of timing/locking problem when a bunch of
> autmount processes are started at once?
> 
>       Is there some experiment we can run to delay the processing
> of each mount?
> 
>       Best regards!
>                                           John
> ___________________________________________________________________
> John Murtari                              Software Workshop Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 315.635-1968(x-211)  "TheBook.Com" (TM)
> http://www.thebook.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to