Paul Jakma wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Paul Jakma wrote:
>
> > unless you dumb it down enough so that linux understands it. :(
>
> [extricate foot from mouth]
>
> that's not say i'm not grateful for linux autofs. :)
>
> what i mean more is:
>
> i love autofs. makes life so much easier for me. is there any chance
> of supporting/grokking things like:
>
> 1. replicated servers.
See previous thread; this doesn't belong in autofs. Complain to the
NFS/mount people.
> 2. mount trees.
autofs v4/v5 has this.
> 3. 'include map' entries.
I'm looking at a reasonable way of doing this. It probably can be done
only into a file map, though. It's an incredibly poor way of doing
this, though (it puts inside the map what should be at a higher level.)
The "multi" map feature in the Linux autofs provides the same
functionality in a more powerful way.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt