Andrew Nelson GRE/IS wrote:
>
> I think Solaris probably has the best approach. Most of this kind of thing
> is handled in a Name Service switch file of sorts. Some of the AIX services
> can be controlled that way also. I believe HPUX is also on this track. Is
> there a major reason Linux doesn't go this route?
>
What's even worse is that at least one way of interpreting nsswitch.conf
(yes, there are multiple ways of doing this...) you risk having to worry
about "oh great I found a + now I have to search through a whole list of
name services."
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
