hi ya peter
yup.... i probably should've added that comment too....
thanx
alvin
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > hi ya hermann
> >
> > > > > > Try to mount mach1 first, if that fails, try mach2
> > > > > > Backup -fstype=nfs mach1,mach2:/Backup
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is it supported on linux.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No. Please ask the author of mount(8) to support it if you want it added
> > > > > (it's easy enough to make autofs support it, but I think it belongs in
> > > > > mount.)
> > > > >
> > > > > -hpa
> > >
> > > Amd supports this - Isn't that in your Autofs/Amd FAQ, Alvin ?
> >
> > if the mount does not support it than autofs wont be able to...
> >
> > if amd uses its own mounting mechanism that i guess its possible...
> >
> > - i havent used amd in several yrs now since i changed over to autofs
> >
> > and am still interested but not looking for failover mountings
> > strategies for mailservers, webservers, home servers etc...etc..
> > - guess nowdays its called "high availability"
> >
> This is part of why I insist this is a mount/NFS issue: only NFS itself
> can provide failover.
>
> -hpa
>
> --
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
> "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
> http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
>
