>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 1 03:39:39 2001
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hera.kernel.org (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [209.10.217.83])
by gateway.camelot.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id DAA11565
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 03:39:37 +0900
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by hera.kernel.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA16343
for autofs-list; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:38:07 -0800
Received: from sunspot.csun.edu (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.166.114.30])
by hera.kernel.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA16338
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:38:07 -0800
Received: from localhost (swalton@localhost)
by sunspot.csun.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f0VHbuA16881;
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:37:56 -0800
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:37:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Buzz Megg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: autofs v4?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Status: O
Content-Length: 609
Lines: 17
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:13:44PM -0500, Buzz Megg wrote:
> > Whence did autofs v4 go?
>
> I'm wondering the same thing.
Well, I'm not using it because I'm lazy and also because I don't want to
break anything here :-) . autofs v3 seems to work and satisfy all my
needs (running under RedHat 6.2) and so I've seen no compelling reason to
upgrade. I admit to losing track: can I run autofs v4 under RedHat
without "upgrading" to 7.0?
---
Stephen Walton, Professor of Physics and Astronomy,
California State University, Northridge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
