>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 31 20:51:23 2001
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hera.kernel.org (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [209.10.217.83])
by gateway.camelot.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id UAA09154
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:51:21 +0900
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by hera.kernel.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA06633
for autofs-list; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:44:42 -0800
Received: from gw.goop.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[206.170.148.147])
by hera.kernel.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA06629
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:44:41 -0800
Received: from ixodes.goop.org (ixodes [192.168.0.5])
by gw.goop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8522B62002; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:44:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ixodes.goop.org (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 273B5104B6; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:44:40 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kenneth Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Arvin Schnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug??
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="=_webhead-1930-997693421-0001-2"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:05:29PM +0100
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Status: O
Content-Length: 1116
Lines: 37
This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your
E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages.
--=_webhead-1930-997693421-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:05:29PM +0100, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> How stable is this ??
>=20
> I don't want to make a new kernel and autofs setup for several computers =
and
> get only to end up with more problems than it solves.
>=20
> I guess I could try it out at home first.
I find it reasonably stable, but I'd love to get more reports of how it
works for other people (either positive or negative). nosymlink does
a local nfs mount, but with recent kernels it can also use a bind mount
rather than a symlink, which gets the same effect as a local nfs mount
at a much lower cost (both autofs 3 and 4 support this).
J
--=_webhead-1930-997693421-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjp37JgACgkQf6p1nWJ6IgLOuACeOjJBuuG7PJ6VUcwl8zUYqPPb
ppEAnihrnkOGGEjTMHtHeuNTcxArOsCJ
=1ElD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=_webhead-1930-997693421-0001-2--
