I haven't been following this thread closely but awhile ago I brought this 
issue up.

I'm in a heterogeneous environment: AIX, HPUX, Linux, Solaris.

With autofs3 on RedHat 7.1 users' home directories were automounted but I 
couldn't get /net to work.

So, I switched to autofs4 and then /net worked but users' home directories 
aren't automounted.

I find I have to "./autofs restart" to automount users' home directories.

If anyone has run into this and found out why I'd appreciate a reply. I can 
live with the solution I have now but it's kinda like a splinter in my mind.

Maybe the start script in rc3.d is occurring too soon? It's S18...

(I also find that I can't /net to HPUX boxes, but AIX, other Linux boxes 
and Solaris boxes are fine).

Cheers

Jason

At 10:19 AM 10/25/2001 -0700, Ogden, Aaron A. wrote:

>That was our original reasoning for using v4, we wanted to get /net working
>the way it does in Solaris.  Do you know of any how-tos to get that working,
>we tried to set that up but we were unsuccessful.  Maybe the problem is that
>we needed to have autofs v4 userspace tools to make that happen.
>
>Thanks for the advice, I will talk to the rest of my team and decide on a
>course of action to fix this.
>Any idea when autofs v4 will go gold?  :-)
>
>--aaron
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: H. Peter Anvin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:14 PM
> > To:   Ogden, Aaron A.
> > Cc:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Schulte, Rick; Waybright, Robert C.
> > Subject:      Re: autofs interoperability problems between linux and
> > solaris
> >
> > Ogden, Aaron A. wrote:
> >
> > > Hmmmmm... I have to agree with you, the combination we are using seems
> > > broken to me.  :-)
> > > So which do you think is most likely to work properly, autofs v3 or v4?
> > I
> > > looked around at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs and the
> > > latest version I could find was autofs-4.0.0pre10.  Is that stable
> > enough to
> > > use, or do you think it would be better to stick with autofs v3 for now?
> > I
> > > can go either way.
> > >
> >
> >
> > autofs v3 has been beaten on for a very, very, very long time and is
> > likely to be the most stable configuration.  autofs v4 seems mostly
> > stable; use it if you have a need or desire for the v4 additional
> > features, such as /net mounts.
> >
> >       -hpa
> >


Reply via email to