On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 11:39, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > This is the way things *should* have worked. This is why trying to > implement pseudo-compatibility is usually a bad idea.
I tend to agree, though I'd like to point out that it is actually
functionally compatible; I guess one thing to try and do is make autofs4
a little more explicit when it fails to do autofs4 things with a v3
kernel module.
J
