Jim Carter wrote:
>
>>A kill -9 on the blocked process needs further investigation. I'm not sure
>>what the situation is there (probably not good).
>
> I would really like it if, when autofs decided to forcibly unmount, it
> could kill the using processes, as in "fuser -k -m /net/host/mountpoint".
> Actually this is a general issue for unmount(8), not specific to autofs.
> But one wonders whether fuser is going to run wild...
>
How on the face of planet Earth do you expect autofs should ever take
such a drastic action? This could only by a human deciding to do so,
and if so, it's not an issue for autofs, as long as human umounts are
properly handled (they should be.)
-hpa
_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
