[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Mike Waychison wrote:



Transparency of an autofs filesystem (as I'm calling it) is the situation
where, given a map

/usr    /man1   server:/usr/man1
        /man2   server:/usr/man2

where the filesystem /usr contains, say a directory lib, that needs to be
available while also seeing the automounted directories.





I see. This requires direct mount triggers to do properly. Trying to do it with some sort of passthrough to the underlying filesystem is a nightmare waiting to happen..




So what are we saying here?

We install triggers at /usr/man1 and /usr/man2.
Then suppose the map had a nobrowse option.
Does the trigger also take care of hiding man1 and man2?

Is there some definition of these triggers?


The example above is a direct map entry with no root offset. The semantics are different than if it were an indirect map with browsing enable.

I tested this out against other automount implementations and discovered that direct map entries with no root offsets should be broken down into several direct map entries with root offsets.. so:

/usr   /man1   server:/usr/man1   \
         /man2   server:/usr/man2

is the same as the two distinct entries:

/usr/man1   server:/usr/man1
/usr/man2   server:/usr/man2

Now that I think about it, the discussion in my proposal paper about multimounts with no root offsets probably isn't required.

--
Mike Waychison
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1 (650) 352-5299 voice
1 (416) 202-8336 voice
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sun.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE: The opinions expressed in this email are held by me, and may not represent the views of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to