Dylan wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2004 20:03 pm, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>
>>However, this doesn't address the issue of the client being *the same
>>system*, in which case you can't just move the IP address away from
>>it, since local == remote; you can no longer send packets to the
>>server and get a response back. You can do it if you can get the
>>client and the server sides to bind to *different* IP addresses, in
>>which case the current autofs behaviour will correctly see them as
>>being separate and mount NFS.
>
> Would binding an alias address to the interface be sufficient?
>
No, you have to force the local port to not be bound to the same
address. I think this can be done with iptables rules, but I'm not
sure... I'm not a networking wizard.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
