On Tue, 4 May 2004, Tom Georgoulias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saw that patch. Was a bit curious about it. Didn't add it.
And it sounds like I ought to remove it, too. :)
Judging by your test results on an empty map, an upgrade to 4.1.2 is in order. Thanks for checking in to that, I appreciate it. I'll start working on getting out a new build of autofs to my systems. 4.1.3 is just around the corner, right?
Yes.
Yet another bug fix release.
Not much in it.
CHANGELOG so far:
xx/xx/2004 autofs-4.1.3
-----------------------
- fixed bug processing --verbose option in init scripts.
- added missing parameter in call to run fsck on ext2 module (from Jeff Moyer).
- added check for executable existance in getldapmounts in init script.
- updated comment about option handling in getmounts in init script.
- updated kernel module patches.
- fix to init script for reload option.
- autofs now requires autoconf later than 2.5
Plus the replicated server patch I'm currently working on and another kernel module patch update.
I think that will be it for 4.1.3 as the kernel module patches need to be updated due to corrections.
Should I wait for the kernel module patches or just go ahead with testing?
I have set aside a Red Hat 8 system to test out the latest patches you have written and want to be sure I make this test as productive as possible for all.
I'm looking at either running the autofs 4.1.2 plus patches from kernel.org, or Jeff Moyer's latest RPM, 4.1.2-5, and using either the 04172004 kernel module patch or waiting for a new one.
Tom -- Tom Georgoulias POPI Classification [x] General Business Information [] Freescale Semiconductor Internal Use [] Freescale Semiconductor Confidential Proprietary
_______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
