On Thu, 6 May 2004, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > Chris Croswhite wrote: > > I ran this on 40 clients last evening through our normal regression runs > > (9 hours, 1.5T of data, 127 mount points) and found that it behaved as > > expected. > > I should clarify, the mount dropping problem I mentioned in my last > message is not specifically related to testing autofs-4.1.2-5 (or any > 4.1.2, I think). I've got 4.1.1 rolled out and those systems are the > ones dropping mounts, at least at this point in time. My intention is > to find a autofs release or set of patches that fixes this behavior > sooner rather than later as it is causing problems for my users. > > Just for my sanity, can anyone help me confirm the following "facts" > about earlier behavior of the autofs-4.1.0pre10 release: > > 1. NIS maps were not cached by the automounter daemon > 2. changes made to the maps and pushed out went into effect > immediately, regardless of whether or not the changes were new key/mount > entries to an existing map or just changes to existing key/mount pairs > withing an existing map.
So your machines are not droping mounts. They just don't know about them, right. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
