On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'm having difficulty understanding the problem you describe.

> We have a problem.  Here are the conditions:
> 
> 1. Shell is (t)csh (does not happen under (ba)sh)
> 2. cd to an autofs fa�ade (e.g. /tools in our case)
> 3. cd relatively to the subdirectory that is the mount point.  
>    NOTE: The mount must not yet be made. (e.g. perl5.8.3)
> 4. cd relatively to a subdirectory in the mounted files system 
>    (e.g. bin or lib)

Sorry, but the cd must cause a mount to happen. This is the case with the 
latest autofs and must be the case for correct operation of autofs.

What is the reasoning here?

> 
> Pertinent stats:
>   * Red Hat EL 3.0 (no update) 2.4.21-4.ELhugemem 
>   * All available Red Hat updates have been applied EXCEPT for kernel
>     autofs, and lpr updates
>   * autofs: autofs-4.1.0-2 from January 04
>   * autofs4: autofs4-2.4-module-20031201

These autofs versions are old. There are known problems fixed after these 
releases that sound similar to the problem you describe.

I recommend you try autofs4 release 20040508. Unfortuneately this release 
requires a kernel rebuild as there is a small mandatory change outside of 
the autofs4 module needed for correct operation. This release is the one 
that should be used as it addresses all known problems and works best with 
the latest autofs release.

You should be using autofs-4.1.3. There is an additional patch that I have 
recommened a couple of times now, without adverse feedback, that my fix 
your problem. I've uploaded it to kernel.org and it can be found at:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v4

named

autofs-4.1.3-bad_chdir.patch

Additionally, I recommend applying:

autofs-4.1.3-mtab_lock.patch

found with the above patch. It fixes an obvios stupid mistake in 
the definition of mount(8)s' lock file name.

As a RHEL user visiting Jeff Moyers autofs page is a must as there are 
patches included their that have not yet been included in an autofs 
release:

http://people.redhat.com/~jmoyer

Jeff, would it be possible to include the two patches mentioned above in 
your rpms please.

Ian




_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to