On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Mike Waychison wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jim Carter wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Ian Kent wrote:
> > 
> >>On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >>
> >>> Server proximity takes priority in the  selection  process.
> >>
> >>Mike, can we define "proximity" and "same network segment" as used in the 
> >>Solaris automounter please (if that's possible).
> > 
> > 
> > The desired behavior (and I think this is what our Sun boxes actually do)  
> > is that if the client has an interface such that (clientIP & netmask) ==
> > (serverIP & netmask) (using the client's same netmask for both), then that
> > server is preferred because the traffic goes direct, not through a router.  
> > The client might have multiple interfaces.
> > 
> 
> I believe this is the right interpretation of the 'weight override' bit
> that Jeff posted from the Solaris automount(1m) manpage.
> 
> However, I believe that algorithm uses some sort of traceroute/rpcping
> to figure out distances and weights are used to prioritize given equal
> distances.  I'll ask around to see what the actual method used is. (a
> tcpdump of this may prove useful ;)

OK. The traceroute idea is good but we have had people with port blocking 
so this would have to be quite smart.

Ian

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to