On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 09:36:31PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can everyone who is maintaining downstream packages please chaeck that
> the code in their package ends up looking like what the patch below
> acheives.
>
> [...]
>
> case EXP_STARTED:
> - sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &ready_sigs, NULL);
> ap.state = ST_EXPIRE;
> + sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &ready_sigs, NULL);
> return 0;
> }
> return 1;
The Debian packages are close, but not quite:
case EXP_STARTED:
sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &lock_sigs, NULL);
ap.state = ST_EXPIRE;
sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &ready_sigs, NULL);
return 0;
I have no idea what lock_sigs does, but this should be OK, no?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
