On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 15:08 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > So what is the actual problem, here? Are you using the automounter? What > do your config files look like?
I guess the problems are: 1) I haven't looked into this very far 2) I was beginning to think I shouldn't continue looking into this because of the red herring in the man page 3) I've been trying sun-style automount maps only (copied from a sun), and I'm not really sure if linux' autofs is compatible with exactly the same format > raven> Can you confirm please Jeff? > > raven> Perhaps you are seeing a bug which needs to be addressed. > > Yes, the replicated server code is present in both of these versions. Sweet. > > raven> Once again I believe that the kernels mentioned here are up to date > raven> wrt autofs. > > raven> Certainly, the latest FC3 kernel is at 2.6.10 which has all the > raven> autofs4 updates included in the base kernel. > > raven> I believe the latest update to RHEL3 is also up to date. Jeff? > > Yes, both kernels have the necessary patches to support replicated server. > > raven> So perhaps you could send a log trace with the "--debug" option > raven> added to the master map entry. > > And please include the contents of your maps! I've attached a shar archive of the two relevant files that we use on Solaris. >
automount-maps.shar
Description: application/shellscript
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
