On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Jeff Moyer wrote:

> 
> Okay, I've reviewed all parts except for the actual logging functions.  I'm
> actually not convinced this is the right approach.  The overhead of setting
> up and tearing down the signal mask is quite expensive.  I fear that
> environments with a great number of mounts will fall over when debugging is
> turned on, and that is the very thing we are trying to save.  Perhaps it is
> worth another look at a separate logging process.
> 

I'm also concerned about using an array to store the log messages.
This could overflow in heavy load mount situations.

Ian

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
autofs@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to