==> Regarding Re: [autofs] replicated mounts patch; [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds:
raven> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Jeff Layton wrote: >> On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:12 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: >>> I'm not saying the original code works. >>> >>> I don't think it will work. Can you test this or should I setup an >>> environment to test it? >> Hmmm, I don't have a multi-homed host to test this on, but it looks to >> me like it should do the right thing. I'll see if I can find one that I >> can test on, but if you have a multi-homed host handy it would save me >> some trouble. raven> I've tested this and it certainly seems to work. raven> But another thing came to mind. raven> We've had complaints about ports and protocols being blocked for the raven> rpc_ping function. raven> Any thoughts on how to work around that? The other thing that raven> plagues us is that when we open TCP sockets they hang around which raven> causes port exaustion. Thoughts on that as well? Depending on what you're doing, you don't need a reserved port to do an RPC NULL function call. I thought we shook this down already, and got rid of all of the unneeded calls using reserved ports? Does this patch actually change any of those interactions? I guess I'll have to look at this earlier than I had planned. -Jeff _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list autofs@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
