On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 22:01 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 2 May 2005, Jeffrey Layton wrote: > > > Here's the latest version of the replicated mounts patch that I've been > > working on. I sent this a couple of weeks ago and got no response. > > I've been trying to get my direct mount stuff working.
Sounds good, just wanted to make sure it didn't slip thru the cracks. I also wanted to make sure I don't allow any regressions as I update my patch for new CVS versions. Also, I've been doing some looking at what it will take to do the "subnet" locality check. The problem seems to be quite a bit more complicated than it seems at first glance. I'm trying to wrap my brain around netlink sockets as that seems to be the best way to get routing/netmask info out of the kernel. We might also want to consider patching "mount" for that effort since the current mount command just picks the first address when given a hostname that resolves to more than one address. If/when my other patch goes in, I'll start focusing on that. -- Jeffrey Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
