On Tue, 31 May 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:

> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 02:42:02PM -0700, Michael Marion wrote:
> > Wonder if this is known.. don't see the same thing in the list, but I'm way
> > behind.
> > 
> > Most hosts failing to mount a test server, but watching packets shows that 
> > it
> > never does try to mount.  I've verified that patching 4.1.4 with:
> > autofs-4.1.4-multi-parse-fix.patch
> > autofs-4.1.4-non-replicated-ping.patch
> > autofs-4.1.4-misc-fixes.patch
> > 
> > fixes the problem, and I'm guessing it's the non-replicated-ping patch that
> > does it as the ok hosts do a lot more rpc traffic. 
> 
> If patching autofs works, why not simply do that?
> 
> > We're trying to figure out if just enabling nfs v2 support, or something 
> > else
> > simple will help in the short term.. I'd rather not update the kernel and
> > automount daemon on 800+ hosts for one path. :)  Though I want to get them 
> > all
> > updated eventually where I can.
> 
> You don't have to update the kernel for the fixes, just the daemon. If you
> have 800+ machines, surely you must have some kind of automated system for
> doing that.

Yep. Assuming I'm right. Resolving this specific issue won't need a kernel 
update.

Ian

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to