> I didn't mean to be nasty. Not taken as such. Sorry -- I should scatter a few more ":-)"'s around :-))
> It's just that it seems like every time I do something in response to > requests someone else then wants the opposite. That's where judgement kicks in. When you have equal numbers objecting to both options, you've got it right :-)) > Actually, using the multiple schema we were seeing up to "nine" queries > per lookup during a mount failure situation Ahh -- I was thinking of the multiple schema only during initial discovery. I was assuming that like the mount_bind code, at the start of day it would look at its environment and decide how to do things. If not told what schema to use, it would try the pre defined (3 at the moment) schema until one of them worked, and then latch onto that one. (e.g. default is the null string, and if it finds the string null, call a discovery procedure). As such this would not effect a mount failure -- it would only be done once at startup (and when it gets a HUP etc) Would it be OTT to add an option to say whether the initial lookup of "auto.master" was single level or recursive? [ I really don't understand why recursive is needed if auto.master is at the top level :-( ] _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
