On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:45 +0100, Matt Bernstein wrote: > At 11:18 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 20:44 +0100, Matt Bernstein wrote: > >> > >> Your patch applied cleanlyish (just line wrapping to deal with), and now > >> it does *most* of the right things. > > > > My mistake, must have broken the patch when I sent it. > > I was able to duplicate the setup reflected in the log and the mount > > succeeded. > > > > How about we try the patch again but properly formatted. > > Same deal, I think :-\ > > Aug 31 10:37:39 laurel automount[20951]: mount(nfs): mounted cream:/export71 > on /server/cream/export71 > Aug 31 10:37:39 laurel automount[20951]: send_ready: token = 2135 > Aug 31 10:37:39 laurel automount[20951]: mounted /server/cream/export71 > Aug 31 10:37:39 laurel automount[20951]: mount_mount: mount(bind): mounted > /server/cream/export71/users type bind on /home/cream/home71 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > looks good > > Aug 31 10:37:39 laurel automount[20951]: send_ready: token = 2134 > Aug 31 10:37:39 laurel automount[20951]: mounted /home/cream/home71 > Aug 31 10:37:39 laurel automount[20951]: mount(nfs): nfs: mount failure > :/home/cream/home71/mb on /homes/mb > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > looks less good
That's just because the nfs mount module calls the bind mount module. If it gets a fail return from the bind mount it reports it itself. But I don't see any fails so I don't understand where this is comming from. > > Aug 31 10:37:39 laurel automount[20951]: send_fail: token = 2133 > Aug 31 10:37:39 laurel automount[20951]: failed to mount /homes/mb > > Maybe my auto.master is not right? Here are the relevant entries: Don't this this has anything to do with this. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
