==> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:05:07 -0200, Fabio Olive Leite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Fabio> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:56:31PM +0900, Ian Kent wrote: Fabio> > Fabio> > Not valid at all. Fabio> > And they are tolerated because the admin explicitly configures DNS to Fabio> > violate the RFC. Fabio> The sad thing is that mount(1) does no such validation, and allows one Fabio> to mount an NFS export on a hostname containing underscores just fine. Fabio> So we can end up in a situation where automount does not allow the Fabio> user to configure a working NFS mount she has. Yes, and when coupled with the fact that some other vendors' products allow this sort of thing by default, I think we may have to support it. I'm a big fan of sticking to the RFC's, but in this case, I think we should make an exception. -Jeff _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
