Newman, Edward (GTI) wrote:
> The situation I am trying to support is the following:
> 
> - With Active Directory all servers are made available through a common
> DNS name (i.e. domain.com)
> - The problem with this is that the DNS name alone returns many IPs and
> these can be remote across a network (round-robin of IP may return a
> remote LDAP server). So we use network location aware DNS name so that
> nearby servers are returned to those applications are not SRV or AD site
> aware. Aufos fits this category. So assume DNS name is "ad.domain.com".
> - The issue for SASL is that there is no service principal name in
> Kerberos for ad.domain.com.
> - Thus we need some way to translate the DNS name to a service principle
> - ldapost.domain.com. This can be done either through forward/reverse
> DNS lookup. A second alternative is the use of dnsHostname in the
> rootdse of the server. Have no particular preference so if DNS is bad
> idea then maybe a quick lookup to rootdse to get name will be required
> for SASL/Kerberos.
> 

Sounds like DNS SRV records fro LDAP. See RFC2782

  http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt

Your AD should have these already defined, assuming the domain is ad.domain.com:

  nslookup
  set type=ANY
  _ldap._tcp.ad.domain.com

And it uses it for Kerberos too:
_kerberos._tcp.ad.domain.com

Not sure if OpenLDAP supports this, Google'ing for openldap srv shows some
interest in it a few years ago.

> I would like to avoid is having to maintain specific lists of hostnames
> in URI list as maintenance, upgrades, etc would require redeploying a
> new configuration to all servers (in my environment several thousand
> servers).
> 
> Adding a mechanism to support LDAP connection pooling seems a good idea
> as it looks like autofs creates a lot of queries - issue for a large
> data centre restarting after a powerdown.
> 
> Let me know how I can help here.
> 
> Edward
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or 
> proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the 
> sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically indicated, 
> this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment 
> products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of 
> any transaction, or an official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to 
> applicable law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain e-communications 
> (EC) traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of each 
> sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, 
> supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are 
> located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This 
> message is subject to terms available at the following link: 
> http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By messaging with Merrill Lynch 
> you consent to the foregoing.

> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> autofs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
> 
> 

-- 

  Douglas E. Engert  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Argonne National Laboratory
  9700 South Cass Avenue
  Argonne, Illinois  60439
  (630) 252-5444

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to