On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 10:15 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > --- autofs-5.0.3-git-ian_kent_patches-vanilla/samples/rc.autofs.in
> > 2008-05-19 17:02:17.071234000 -0700 
> > +++ autofs-5.0.3-git-ian_kent_patches/samples/rc.autofs.in
> > 2008-05-19 18:15:39.881408000 -0700 
> > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ 
> >                 fi 
> >         fi
> > 
> > -       $prog $OPTIONS 
> > +       $DAEMON $OPTIONS 
> >         RETVAL=$? 
> >         if [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ] ; then 
> >                 echo "done." 
> > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ 
> >                 [ $RETVAL = 0 -a -z "`pidof $DAEMON`" ] || sleep 3 
> >                 count=`expr $count + 1` 
> >         done 
> > -       if [ -n "`pidof $DAEMON`" ] ; then 
> > +       if [ -z "`pidof $DAEMON`" ] ; then 
> >                 echo "done." 
> >         else 
> >                 echo "failed."
> > 
> 
> Both these have come up before.
> In fact I think I changed the if test, so now do we change it back?
> I'm not sure why I didn't change the daemon path before but maybe there
> was a reason for it. I'll need to think about that.

Ahhh, but this last hunk was fixed in redhat/autofs.init.in and not in
samples/rc.autofs.in. To keep these consistent I'll change the messages
instead of the if.

Ian


_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to