On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > J.P. King wrote: > > Ideally we would do something like include all the files from a > > configuration directory and have a HUP get it to re-read all these > > configuration snippets. This would be a relatively involved change > > however. > > > > This sounds like a perfect use of an executable map to me. I don't know > exactly what your maps look like, but it seems to me that since you have > an unusual local requirement it would make sense to deal with it in a > manner external to autofs itself.
That's an excellent suggestion! At my site we used an executable map to get the effect of submounts, before I figured out how to do the job with submounts. It was reliable and reasonably efficient. James F. Carter Voice 310 825 2897 FAX 310 206 6673 UCLA-Mathnet; 6115 MSA; 405 Hilgard Ave.; Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095-1555 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.ucla.edu/~jimc (q.v. for PGP key) _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
