On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 11:33 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 16:39 -0700, Jim Carter wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > There is a pattern of failure that may not be automount's fault. On > > > > > almost exactly 0.1% of the attempted mounts, the readdir eventually > > > > > fails > > > > > with ENOENT.... > > > > > > This could be related to the expire issue I saw in my tests so we need > > > to test my slightly updated patch and see before we go into this. > > > Hopefully I haven't regressed from the last test. > > > > > > So here is my updated revision 8 of the patch against the SuSE package > > > as usual. > > > > OK, I ran it for 4 hrs 19 mins, doing 5900 mount-expire cycles. No threads > > hung. There were 5 ENOENT events -- the rate was not statistically > > different from the previous long test. > > Would it be to difficult to get a debug log for this. > I need to find out whether this is happening in the kernel or in the > daemon.
And if possible an indication of when a couple of these events occurred would be really useful, so I can locate them in the log. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
