Hi! > > > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=autofs5&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all > > > > > > So, I don't know how much effort it would be to backport them to glibc > > > 2.3 instead of 2.7 and so on... > > > > Jan Christoph Nordholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (who is listed as > > maintainer of the package) might be able to tell. > > I don't think that it's very problematic to backport the autofs5 package to > Etch. > I'm working on it. (Thanks to Steffen for mailing me directly - I follow this > mailinglist, but sometimes I lag behind a bit.)
I don't know if this has changed with the latest patches, but last time I tried autofs5 used a symbol from openldap that was not in etch's openldap (LDAP_CONTROL_PAGEDRESULTS), which could be fixed by patching that symbol into the autofs-source, but since then it's crashing on us every now and then. Sorry to be so vague, but I didn't have time to debug the crash any further. Other than that, autofs5 is order magnitudes better and more reliable than 4 ever was. Seriously. > Regards, > > Jan -- Lukas _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
