> Details would be welcome. The biggest offender we found was that the
> portmapper interfaces would use reserved ports. That is simply not
> necessary, and those issues have been fixed in autofs and mount.nfs. In
> fact, we've got regression tests that make sure that this is the case.
yes, i have found that as well. i think the biggest consumer is ypserv
tcp connections for doing a full map dump.
here is my rpcinfo:
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100024 1 udp 844 status
100024 1 tcp 847 status
100004 2 udp 994 ypserv
100004 1 udp 994 ypserv
100004 2 tcp 997 ypserv
100004 1 tcp 997 ypserv
100007 2 udp 1007 ypbind
100007 1 udp 1007 ypbind
100007 2 tcp 1010 ypbind
100007 1 tcp 1010 ypbind
100011 1 udp 835 rquotad
100011 2 udp 835 rquotad
100011 1 tcp 838 rquotad
100011 2 tcp 838 rquotad
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 3 udp 2049 nfs
100003 4 udp 2049 nfs
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 4 tcp 2049 nfs
100021 1 udp 39755 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 39755 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 39755 nlockmgr
100021 1 tcp 32773 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 32773 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 32773 nlockmgr
100005 1 udp 852 mountd
100005 1 tcp 855 mountd
100005 2 udp 852 mountd
100005 2 tcp 855 mountd
100005 3 udp 852 mountd
100005 3 tcp 855 mountd
_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
