On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 14:30 +0100, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > > The negative cache working properly will return a fail immediately so > > you shouldn't see this. > > > > But then it shouldn't happen for the first case either. > > There are quite a few changes scheduled for the next update and I > > haven't seen this for a while now so it's a bit hard to get exited about > > it. > > > > > Ok, I understand - in summary: > #1 problem should go [hopefully] away with 5.3 > #2 problem is known bug being worked on....
Right, but problem #1 may be tied to problem #2, not quite sure yet. A fix for the negative cache issue is way too late for 5.3. We would need to get a test package to you for that, once it's done. > Thanks! > O. _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
