Ian Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 11:00 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> >> The negative caching is done in userspace. I'm not sure I understand >> your question. > > Me neither but I'm working on the negative caching of non-existent map > keys. Turns out to be a bit tricky when multiple nsswitch sources can be > tried for each mount since the map may not exist within a given source > and so we get NSS_STATUS_UNAVAIL instead of NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND. Maybe I > should just cache the unavailable in the same way?
Ian, this is autofs version 4. It's been a while since I implemented the negative caching there, but I'd be interested in knowing if you think I got it wrong for the case above! Cheers, Jeff _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
