Hello,
If I compare the 2.6.18 and 2.6.20 kernel trees after applying,
respectively, autofs4-2.6.18-v5-update-20090903.patch and
autofs4-2.6.20-v5-update-20090903.patch, I can understand most of the
differences, but this specific chunk seems strange to me:
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.18.8/fs/autofs4/root.c linux-2.6.20.21/fs/autofs4/root.c
--- linux-2.6.18.8/fs/autofs4/root.c 2010-01-08 13:34:35.000000000 -0200
+++ linux-2.6.20.21/fs/autofs4/root.c 2010-01-11 09:00:28.000000000 -0200
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ static int autofs4_dir_open(struct inode
* autofs file system so just let the libfs routines handle
* it.
*/
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
if (!d_mountpoint(dentry) && __simple_empty(dentry)) {
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
return -ENOENT;
Was this line left out by mistake? If yes, can you please consider the patch
below?
Thanks,
Leonardo
Index: autofs/patches/autofs4-2.6.18-v5-update-20090903.patch
===================================================================
--- autofs.orig/patches/autofs4-2.6.18-v5-update-20090903.patch
+++ autofs/patches/autofs4-2.6.18-v5-update-20090903.patch
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@
+ * autofs file system so just let the libfs routines handle
+ * it.
+ */
++ spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ if (!d_mountpoint(dentry) && __simple_empty(dentry)) {
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
-
Index: autofs/patches/autofs4-2.6.19-v5-update-20090903.patch
===================================================================
--- autofs.orig/patches/autofs4-2.6.19-v5-update-20090903.patch
+++ autofs/patches/autofs4-2.6.19-v5-update-20090903.patch
@@ -1041,6 +1041,7 @@
+ * autofs file system so just let the libfs routines handle
+ * it.
+ */
++ spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ if (!d_mountpoint(dentry) && __simple_empty(dentry)) {
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
-
_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
