Le 29 mai 2012 à 13:16, Stefano Lattarini a écrit : > + But Autommake-NG *won't follow those implicit chains of pattern rules* > + anymore; so that the idiom above will have to be re-worked like follows > + to preserve its intent and behaviour:
I would be happy if there were a means to help Automake-ng to know there are transitive rules playing in here. That's one of the nice features from Make, so it would be nice that Automake new about it. Even if that means adding something specific to tell Automake. Also, Automake used to be magical, dwim. Here, reading the doc will be needed.
