On 07/22/2012 09:18 AM, Akim Demaille wrote: > > Le 22 juil. 2012 à 08:57, Stefano Lattarini a écrit : > >> +# Two check are done here: > > checks > Fixed.
>> +# - if we have two pattern rules from which the same file (or set of > > s/we have // (th shrtr, th btr :). > But this would make the sentence grammatically incorrect, no? Maybe s/we have/there are/ instead? >> +# files) can be built, both are applicable, and both results in the >> +# same target stem, then the first one wins. >> +# - if we have two pattern rules from which the same file (or set of > > ditto. > Likewise :-) >> +# files) can be built, both are applicable, but the resulting target >> +# stems are different, then the "most specific" one (i.e., that which >> +# result in the shortest stem) is used. >> +# We take advantage of such features at least in our 'parallel-tests' >> +# support. > > Ok. Thanks, Stefano
