Il 22/08/2012 14:23, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
>> > True, but in the make dist case, automake has otherwise no business in
>> > parsing the dist-format options.
>> >
> But IMHO it makes sense to keep the need/ability to recognize those options
> "segregated" in '_process_option_list', rather than spread throughout the
> code base.
It is a bit ugly that _process_option_list has to know about the
no-dist-gzip option in order to give a warning. This way, I can give a
superior error message if somebody specifies no-dist-xz. But if you
added support for another dist-fooz option you wouldn't have to touch
automake.in nor lib/Automake at all.
> The rest of the code (whether in the automake script or in
> the generated makefiles) should only be aware that "such and such dist
> formats have been specified through means other than the AM_DIST_FORMATS
> variable", not needing to worry about the details of such specifications
> ("dist-xz has been given in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, and no-dist-gzip has been
> given in AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS").
That's indeed the point of patch 1/2.
Paolo
