Hello Ralf, On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 01:22:31PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stepan Kasal wrote on Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:26:34PM CEST: > [sleep before the first aclocal call]
thank you that you kindly repeated the explanation for me. I apologize that I was not able to see it in your previous mail. > > Why does stamp has to be younger than configure? > > ... the output of `ls -1t configure newer' Oh, so the extra sleep is the result that you are not using find configure -newer stamp > > [am_AUTORECONF] > is merely an optimization, is does not harm execution. I did not understand that the eventual omission of this code is actually harmless. Thanks for your explanation. Have a nice day, Stepan