-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/21/2009 3:03 PM: > Hi Eric, > > * Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:30:05PM CET: >> So now the question becomes, is it okay to apply this patch for >> cosmetic reasons, and with a changed summary line? > > If you prefer so, then sure, why not (both branches).
Done. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake [email protected] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkl6RlgACgkQ84KuGfSFAYAarACgrk+joyVom/uueIj+EDCAYn6m Cr8AoKFuQ9px2WaUCF0dSe5D7oRps17g =eLF3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
