isn't xz extremely sloooow with -9? maybe it wasn't a bug, bit intentionally not used, as that huge extra amount of time doesn't result in that many bytes saved.
is the compression level configureable somehow? Regards, Andreas
isn't xz extremely sloooow with -9? maybe it wasn't a bug, bit intentionally not used, as that huge extra amount of time doesn't result in that many bytes saved.
is the compression level configureable somehow? Regards, Andreas