At Tuesday 06 July 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > Please give me another week to review the series; OK; but note that this message wasn't meant to hurry you: if this change goes in automake, it's not gonna need a fast review, but rather a careful one, even if it's slow (as is usually the case with careful reviews). I just thought that the feature could be a reasonable candidate for a new branch, which BTW would have given me a first opportunity to mess around with remote branching and pushing without touching/endangering the master/maint branches. > for that, it > shouldn't be necessary to post updated patches nor push a branch; > I have your patches in an old branch sitting here. Agreed. But I think it would be a good idea anyway to edit the ChangeLog of the [PATCH 2/6] to cite also Solaris 10 /usr/xpg4/bin/make rather than only Heirloom make. > If you haven't > heard back from me by next Monday, then feel free to push a > branch, but please rebase it against maint not master, if that is > at all possible for the changes in this series. Yes, it's definitely possibile. But why maint? I'm not so sure the change should to be considered as maintainance/bugfixing only...
> > If I'm not mistaken, a remote branch can be deleted anyway in > > the future (in case it turns out to be a dead end). > > Yes, that is true. Thanks, Stefano
