On 22 Jan 2022 18:58, Karl Berry wrote: > may be interesting for debugging, so that when a user send a verbose > - output we don't have to ask him for more details. Display stderr > + output we don't have to ask them for more details. Display stderr > > I'd like to say "when users" here instead of "when a user", to avoid the > singular/plural conflict, since it's easily avoidable in this case. (I > know it isn't always.) Also, independently, "a verbose output" is wrong > English. So: > > --- a/t/README > +++ b/t/README > .. > - may be interesting for debugging, so that when a user send a verbose > + may be interesting for debugging, so that when users send verbose > output we don't have to ask them for more details. Display stderr > > Similarly for the HACKING change: > > --- a/HACKING > +++ b/HACKING > @@ -24,8 +24,9 @@ > .. > -* If somebody reports a new bug, mention their name in the commit message > - that fixes or exposes the bug, and add a line for them in THANKS. > +* If a person or people report a new bug, mention their name(s) in the > + commit message that fixes or exposes the bug, and add a line for them > + in THANKS. > > > Any objection? --thanks, karl.
these tweaks/approach make sense as a general thing, thanks -mike
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature