Hi Alex,
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 07:01:52PM +0100, Alex Hornby wrote:
> Apart from the obvious difficultly of multi ORB setup etc, to keep
> clients small it is often desirable to put the IDL client stubs in a
> library, keeping the server stubs in the server executable.
Why wouldn't you put the skeletons (server-side stubs) in the same
library as the stubs? The size of the client is not affected by
placing the skeletons in the same library the stubs are located, since
the stubs generally don't depend on the skeletons. The linker will
simply link the stub objects to the client, not the skeletons. OTOH,
skeletons generally do depend on the stubs so it would be somewhat
beneficial to have a single library containing both stubs and
skeletons, IMO.
-Ossama
--
Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine
1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068 70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8
