Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Akim> As a first step, I can apply this patch *but* with this part and
> Akim> the --Werror part in defs.
>
> I don't see a `defs' change here.
Hm, I suppose I'm still using `but' incorrectly: I meant that
precisely I don't apply the --Werror part in defs.
> Akim> * tests/lex2.test, tests/sinclude.test, tests/suffix3.test:
> Akim> Run automake with --Wno-error.
>
> Ok.
>
> Why do we sometimes need --Wno-error?
src/am/tests % cat lex2.test nostromo 13:03
#! /bin/sh
# Test to make sure AC_PROG_LEX is an error.
. $srcdir/defs || exit 1
cat >> configure.in << 'END'
AC_PROG_CC
AC_PROG_LEX
AC_DECL_YYTEXT
END
cat > Makefile.am << 'END'
bin_PROGRAMS = zot
zot_SOURCES = joe.l
LDADD = @LEXLIB@
END
: > joe.l
$AUTOMAKE 2> output || exit 1
test -n "`cat output`"
am/tests/testSubDir % am --foreign nostromo 13:03
configure.in: 10: automake requires `AM_PROG_LEX', not `AC_PROG_LEX'
configure.in: 11: `AC_DECL_YYTEXT' is covered by `AM_PROG_LEX'
These are tests were precisely you check that warnings don't exit 1.
