>>>>> "Thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thi> i could not find ready documentation (automake 1.6.1) on how to Thi> emulate the "include .deps/foo.Ptexi" since, if i add that to Thi> Makefile.am, it seems automake interprets that for itself instead Thi> of passing it through to the end Makefile. Yes, that's right. Thi> the workaround is to have configure run a program after invoking Thi> config.status to do the job. is there a better way? Perhaps not :-(. This really isn't too different from what automake itself actually does. Thi> my question is: is there a canonical way to do this w/in the Thi> automake worldview that i've not yet discovered? if not, what Thi> would be the best way to contribute general handling of .texi Thi> generation to automake? It would be nice to let other tools that generate dependencies well integrate into automake seamlessly. As far as I know nobody has really thought about the problem though (you seem to be the first person to be interested). Thi> the other top-level question is: i noticed "automake in guile per Thi> rms request" in a todo list (somewhere). has anyone started Thi> that? if not, is anyone in the audience interested in funding Thi> that work? Nobody has started doing that. It seems pretty unlikely to ever happen. Tom
