Bruce Korb wrote:

Perhaps dump all the .texi-derived files into a subdirectory? WRT what program and options to use, you'll need two substitution variables. The texi2html output is just so much better than the makeinfo version that there must be a way to say, "use that."


Richard> For consistency, if an html_TEXINFOS thing (primary?)
Richard> is added, it seems that there should be pdf_TEXINFOS,
Richard> etc. too.

eww...

8)


Time to rethink the mechanism. :-)



Perhaps it's time to look at the makeinfo --html output and improve it?


Earnie.





Reply via email to